Re: Unicode combining characters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Unicode combining characters
Date
Msg-id 20011004124323U.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unicode combining characters  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Unicode combining characters
List pgsql-hackers
> What's your feeling now about the original question: whether to enable
> multibyte by default now, or not?  I'm still thinking that Peter's
> counsel is the wisest: plan to do it in 7.3, not today.  But this fix
> seems to eliminate the only hard reason we have not to do it today ...

If SQL99's I18N staffs would be added in 7.3, it means both the
multibyte support and the locale support might disappear, then 2might
be merged into it (not sure about NLS. is that compatible with, for
example, per column charset?)

So, for none multibyte users, the multibyte support would be
one-release-only-functionality: suddenly appears in 7.2 and disappears
in 7.3. I'm afraid this would cause more troubles rather than
usefullness.

What do you think?
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one IP?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode combining characters