Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem)
Date
Msg-id 20010929183013.A4360@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance question (stripped down the problem)  ("Steve Wolfe" <steve@iboats.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:25:13AM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
> > There is a user specifieable value somewhere that controls how expensive
> an
> > index scan is and how expensive a seqential scan is. By tuning those you
> > could probably get the effect you want.
>
>   Hmmm.... nice.  Can anybody point me to that value?

In the documentation, section 3.4.1 here.

PostgreSQL 7.1.3 Administrator's Guide > Server Runtime Environment >
   Planner and Optimizer Tuning

There's a whole bunch of tunable variables. It does say that there is not
much idea of what values are good so any experiments would be helpful.

HTH,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Magnetism, electricity and motion are like a three-for-two special offer:
> if you have two of them, the third one comes free.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tod McQuillin
Date:
Subject: Re: Recreating unique index for primary key
Next
From: "Dinesh Parikh"
Date:
Subject: Re: Dynamic Query problem