Re: PostgreSQL funding/organization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: PostgreSQL funding/organization
Date
Msg-id 200109201610.MAA02604@www.wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL funding/organization  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 20 September 2001 11:04 am, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > ... but PostgreSQL cannot be orphaned in that
> > sense due to its open source nature.

> I'll second that. It isn't just "the open source nature" of PostgreSQL
> which will keep it viable, it is the active developer and user community

Sorry.  My semantics are 'open source status'!='open source nature' -- having 
an open source nature includes the developer community's openness.  Many 
projects have open source status -- few have an open source nature.  I should 
have clarified what I meant.

See my letter to Linux Weekly News from a few weeks ago to find out what I 
see in 'open source nature.'
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: type casting troubles
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Shutdown TRUE?