It seems to be resonable to leave #define UNICODE_CONVERSION somewhere
(maybe in pg_config.h).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > Hannu Krosing writes:
> >
> > > I'm contemplating porting pg to PocketPC/WinCE platform and there the
> > > size does matter. And as WinCE is pure unicode platform there should be
> > > no need for 'conversions'.
> >
> > The Unicode support is about 1 MB on disk. If you want to run a server
> > and you don't have the extra 1 MB then you've got problems.
>
> A server does not necessaryly mean "A Huge DataWarehousing Server", it
> may
> be just a fancy addressbook with some growth potential.
>
> > Plus, you might have clients connecting that are not pure Unicode.
>
> I may refuse to serve them ;)
>
> > Of course I don't completely understand the setup you have in mind. Is
> > WinCE POSIX-compatible?
>
> no. it is an embedded os most compatible to Win32 (an OS found on some
> Intel x86 based PC's ;) so it would be much easier if a non-cygwin Win32
> port was done first.
>
> it is run on Compaqs iPAQ and other handheld devices, where memory is
> still
> a bit problem (16MB of Flash ROM and 32-64 of RAM in standard
> configurations,
> iPAQ has 200MHz StrongARM processor) While that may seem very little
> now, I've
> run postgres on much worse hardware only a few years ago (40MHz 486sx
> with
> 16Mb ram and 20Mb HDD)
>
> The port, if ever done, will require much mucking about in internals and
> may
> not be possible inside the main source tree anyway so you should not
> worry too
> much if removing --enable-unicode-conversion would make some things much
> easier.
>
> The clients will mostly connect from the same device and quite likely
> one
> at a time.
>
> As linux is already ported to iPAQ it may be easier to use Linux version
> of
> postgres there but even then space consuption is of some concern.
>
> OTOH it seems to be a good goal to have Postgres be able to run
> everywhere
> where Linux can ;)
>
> ---------------
> Hannu
>
