Re: Log rotation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: Log rotation?
Date
Msg-id 20010906123322.8DA541A6B@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log rotation?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Tom Lane
> Also, I kinda thought the long-range solution was to encourage everyone
> to migrate to syslog logging ...
> 
> > And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
> 
> Why not?

Well, one "why not" might be that syslog is not a guaranteed delivery
logging system.  It might be good enough for some applications but I
don't think that it should be forced on everyone.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS access
Next
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a problem running vacuum in the middle of a transaction?