This is all applied, right?
> OK, I've changed the vacuum code now so your index doesn't get
> departialised. The changes seem pretty obvious so they're probably right.
> They certainly didn't seem to break my simple tests. How does one test that
> VACUUM works properly?
>
> I think it's time to send it to pgsql-patches now, unless someone spots a
> serious problem.
>
> http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/partial-indices-7.2.patch
>
> Anyway, now it's time to think about after. I can think of:
> * Complete the removal of EXTEND INDEX
> * Allow IS NULL in the predicate
>
> Anything else?
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> > It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> > actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> > the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
