Re: Re: Perfomance decreasing - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Einar Karttunen
Subject Re: Re: Perfomance decreasing
Date
Msg-id 20010820212456.C10587@cs.helsinki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance decreasing  ("Ivan Babikov" <iab@qms.e-burg.ru>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:09:33PM +0600, Ivan Babikov wrote:
>
> > In this case, however, I think he may be understating too much.  I read
> the original question as "PostgreSQL is not useful for production systems."
> Call me melodramatic if you like: you are probably right.
> >
> > The point, I guess, is this: it would be really useful to have a document
> somewhere that honestly described the limitations of (the current version
> of) PostgreSQL.
>
> Do you mean Postgres becomes very weak when the size of a database achieves
> 1.5Gb or something close to it?
>
> Maybe this is one of typical questions, but I have heard people complaining
> that Postgres is just for quite small bases. Now we have to choose a free
> database for then inexpensive branch of our project and Interbase looks
> better at capability to work with quite big bases (up to 10-20Gb). I am not
> sure now that Postgres will work with bases greater than 10Gb, what does All
> think?
>
> Thanks in advance, Ivan Babikoff.
>
In my experience postgresql has no problems with big databases. I have had several
problems but they had to do with the os and hardware not the db.

- Einar Karttunen

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "s8854617"
Date:
Subject: How to create a stand alone plpgsql proc
Next
From: "Hugh Mandeville"
Date:
Subject: Re: The mysterious BLOB and bytea data types