Re: USING HASH considered harmful? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: USING HASH considered harmful?
Date
Msg-id 200108170159.f7H1x2919714@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to USING HASH considered harmful?  (Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>)
Responses Re: USING HASH considered harmful?  (Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> We've just discovered a rather nasty feature of hashes, namely that
> simultaneous reads & writes to a single row will deadlock if there
> is a hash index on the table.
>
> I guess this is because PG really has to lock the hash table entry in
> both cases. It does, however, make HASH indices completely useless for
> any table that you might want to update.
>
> Is this a known feature?

Yes, I have heard about this problem.  Would you test btree vs hash and
report back which is faster.  I have requested this from >20 people and
no one reported back.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: USING HASH considered harmful?
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance decreasing