Corrina,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > What about trying to tackle this from another point of view? I'm not
> > sure if this is doable or acceptable, but what about adding logic to the
> > Cygwin DLL so that it does not send SIGHUP (to itself) when the process is
> > running under cygrunsrv?
>
> Hmmm, sounds like an ugly hack to me...
Which is why I couched the above with "acceptable." However, there are
other Unix daemons (e.g., inetd) that will respond to SIGHUP in a similar
manner. Is modifying all of them, instead of just the Cygwin DLL, better?
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
