[PATCH] Partial indices final? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject [PATCH] Partial indices final?
Date
Msg-id 20010712011401.A3918@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCH] Partial indices final?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
OK, I've changed the vacuum code now so your index doesn't get
departialised. The changes seem pretty obvious so they're probably right.
They certainly didn't seem to break my simple tests. How does one test that
VACUUM works properly?

I think it's time to send it to pgsql-patches now, unless someone spots a
serious problem.

http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/partial-indices-7.2.patch

Anyway, now it's time to think about after. I can think of:
* Complete the removal of EXTEND INDEX
* Allow IS NULL in the predicate

Anything else?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: news server access down?
Next
From: Christian Bucanac
Date:
Subject: RE: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?