Re: [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])] - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])] |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200106271807.f5RI7Kx09313@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])] (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>) |
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Done. See TODO web page for [java] link. > Bruce, > > Can this email get added as detail for this todo item. > > thanks, > --Barry > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:33:44 -0700 > From: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com> > To: Dave@micro-automation.net > CC: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org > References: <008301c0ff2d$c885d880$0201a8c0@INSPIRON> > > Dave, > > I personaly don't think it is worth the time to make this work correctly > against a 7.0 database. I think we should focus on fixing this for 7.1 > first. Then later see if it still makes sense to work on getting 7.0 > support done. > > thanks, > --Barry > > Dave Cramer wrote: > > > Barry, > > > > The getXXXFunctions aren't implemented > > Some of the other functions are correct for version 7.1 but not for > > previous versions. Ie. The row length, etc. I think the driver should > > get the version and determine what is correct for each version. > > > > I think this is incorrect. > > public boolean supportsSelectForUpdate() throws SQLException > > { > > // XXX-Not Implemented > > return false; > > } > > > > There are a number of things here which are hard coded, and possible > > wrong. > > > > I started to work on this, but since I am going on vacation next week I > > have a number of fires to get down to a slow burn before I go. > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry@xythos.com] > > Sent: June 26, 2001 9:22 PM > > To: Dave Cramer > > Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]) > > > > Dave, > > > > Can you give a little more detail on what you mean by 'Improved > > DatabaseMetaData'? What specific areas are currently lacking? > > > > thanks, > > --Barry > > > > > > > >>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:56:18PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I have to agree, we need to compile a todo list. > >>>> > >>>>Mine would include: > >>>> > >>>>1) Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already. > >>>>2) Updateable resultSet > >>>>3) Improved DatabaseMetaData > >>>>4) Compatible blob support > >>>> > >>>> > >>Added to official PostgreSQL TODO: > >> > >>* JDBC > >> * Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already. > >> * Updateable resultSet > >> * Improved DatabaseMetaData > >> * Compatible blob support > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
pgsql-jdbc by date: