Philip Warner wrote:
> At 13:28 24/06/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >If someone wants to implement them, be my guest. I originally needed them
> >for fixing the RI permission problems, but they couldn't be used for that
> >after all.
> >
>
> They were part of a larger permissions overhaul that Jan proposed - IIRC,
> at the time you objected, citing your prior proposal. Are you now saying
> you are happy with Jan's original proposal? Or just the setuid functions?
More a bunch of ideas instead of a fully thought through proposal. But IIRC we wanted to attack the overhaul
of the access control system while doing schemas - no?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
