Re: Removal of temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Removal of temp tables
Date
Msg-id 200106142017.f5EKHan20338@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removal of temp tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> If you don't like pg_temp here, maybe post_temp?  pgsql_temp?
>
> > What if I call the directory tmp or pgsql_tmp and the files
> > pgsql_pid_#.#?
>
> Why are you so eager not to call temp files "temp"?  If you want to
> spell it "pgsql_tmp" or "pg_temporary" or something different from
> "pg_temp", that's fine, but I really think the files ought to clearly
> label themselves as temporary.  "pid" is not a clear label.  With a
> name like that, people might even think they are lock files.

I wanted to call them pid so people knew what the file number meant.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of temp tables
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of temp tables