> > My inclination would actually be to rip out the cache entirely. bsearch
> > in a table this size is not so expensive that we need to bypass it, nor
> > is it apparent that we are going to see lots of successive lookups for
> > the same keyword anyway. How long has that cache been in there, and
> > what was the motivation for adding it to begin with?
>
> The cache lookup came from the gods themselves at Berkeley ;)
Wow, I didn't know that. I like the phrase.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
