> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Could we make the assumption that table names in catalogs
> > will be of type 'name'?
>
> I wouldn't want to guarantee it for the information schema.
>
> > If so, it'd work to make two versions of the has_table_privilege
> > function, one taking type "name" and the other taking type "text".
> > The "name" version would take its input as-is, the "text" version
> > would do case folding and truncation.
>
> Target typing is ugly.
>
> I've tried to look up the supposed \paraphrase{we had enough problems
> before we added the existing behaviour to setval, etc.} discussion but
> couldn't find it. My experience on the mailing list is that it goes the
> other way.
I am confused. What are you suggesting as far as having a name and text
version of the functions?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
