Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files
Date
Msg-id 200106120114.f5C1E3o08658@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
]> > I thought we agreed to merge them already.
> 
> We did?  Good.  Will make it so.

I know Peter mentioned it a long time ago.

> > Also, could we modify
> > IndexScanOK() to catch this case and do a heap scan?
> 
> How?  Also, why?

I remember problems getting the index on pg_index because of recursive
lookups so I thought you could either have bootstrap mode ignore the
pg_shadow index or have recursion identified and fallback to heapscan,
but if you merge them there isn't much point.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files
Next
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] addition of text_inet, text_cidr and inet_set_masklen