Re: AW: AW: Postgres Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Darren Johnson
Subject Re: AW: AW: Postgres Replication
Date
Msg-id 20010612.14371800@j2.us.greatbridge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: AW: Postgres Replication  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers

> Imho an implementation that opens a separate client connection to the
> replication target is only suited for async replication, and for that a 
WAL
> based solution would probably impose less overhead.


Yes there is significant overhead with opening a connection to a 
client, so Postgres-R creates a pool of backends at start up, 
coupled with the group communication system (Ensemble) that
significantly reduces this issue.


Very good points,

Darren




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: root
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Postgres Replication
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: global.bki vs template1.bki init files