On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Denis A. Doroshenko writes:
>
> > isn't that logical, to use history when configure found history
> > functions?
>
> That means it found the functions in a library, but it does not mean it
> found them in a header file.
please, be good and tell me why can't we use history _really found in
libreadline_, just because of some headers missing? if example proggie
using readline with history has been successfully compiled and linked,
with no headers, who cares about the header files?
i just can't understand the point... :-(
> > OpenBSD does not have readline/history.h nor it has
> > history.h,
>
> What edition of readline does OpenBSD supply?
heh, sounds weird, but i can't tell you :-) it seems to be readline
which comes with GNU binutils (version 2.9 for OpenBSD 2.8, AFAIK).
--
Denis A. Doroshenko [GPRS/IN/WAP, VAS group engineer] .-. _|_ |
[Omnitel Ltd., T.Sevcenkos st. 25, Vilnius, Lithuania] | | _ _ _ .| _ |
[Phone: +370 9863486 E-mail: d.doroshenko@omnitel.net] |_|| | || |||(/_|_
