Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Date
Msg-id 200105171142.f4HBgsY07852@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
> Bruce got pounded (quite properly I thought) for applying patches
> during late beta that he had not verified and indeed was not in a
> position to verify.  The rules need to be at least as stringent for
> patches that go into a stable-release branch, since we don't normally
> do much beta testing for dot-releases.  But as long as someone has
> adequately checked the patch, I don't think there should be a rule
> against putting bug fixes into 7.1.* ...

Toward the end, I actually got approval from other JDBC developers
before applying patches and people were still not happy.  Also, this was
during feature freeze in February, not even in beta yet.

I know it was February because I just applied all my outstanding JDBC
patches since February 1, and many of those should probably have been in
7.1.X too.

So, I am not going to apply it.  If someone else wants to, go ahead.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()