Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl - Mailing list pgsql-patches

> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> > >
> > > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
> >
> > I realize what you are saying now.  Older versions of ODBC still
> > reference indisclustered, even though it was bogus.  I will put the
> > column into pg_index and mark it to be removed at some future date.
>
> why is it being removed again? I think I missed that discussion, sorry ;(

It is not being used by anything and is confusing client interface
developers because they think it is being set somewhere.  It is not, but
we will keep it because ODBC references it, meaningless as it is.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026