Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres)) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak
Subject Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Date
Msg-id 20010509111235.A18101@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:48:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Can someone remind me what we are going to do with this?
> 
> > This patch add to 7.0.2 code NOCREATETABLE and NOLOCKTABLE feature:

It's my old patch, it's usable and some people use it for 7.0.x. But 
it's really temporary solution and it was 1 day in official CVS :-) 
We remove it after discussion with Peter E. More correct will implement 
better privilege system.
A privilege system is *very* important for real multiuser and 
sophisticated systems. For example if you compare PostgreSQL with Oracle, 
the PostgreSQL is really not winner in this part. Peter has some idea
about it and Jan sent something about it too, but I not sure if somebody
works on this and plannig it for some next release (or...? -- will good 
if I not right:-) 
        Karel 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bug w ith pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?)
Next
From: Alessio Bragadini
Date:
Subject: Re: Outstanding patches