Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
Date
Msg-id 200105072336.f47NaD511077@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Sounds fine, but aren't most people who we ask for stats superusers?
> 
> Are they?  I don't think we should assume that.

OK, just asking.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: System catalog representation of access privileges
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: CVS branch management (was Re: A problem with new pg_dump)