On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:09:38PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> A small debate started with bad performance on ReiserFS. I pondered the likely
> advantages to raw device access. It also occured to me that the FAT file system
> is about as close to a managed raw device as one could get. So I did some
> tests:
> /sdb1 is either an ext2 or FAT file system used as "pg_xlog" with a symlink.
One little thought: does mounting ext2 with 'noatime' makes any
difference? AFAIK fat does not have concept of atime, so then
it would be more fair? Just a thought.
--
marko
