Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date
Msg-id 200103291212.HAA30130@jupiter.jw.home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> > > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > > including UnixWare.  The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> > > if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.
> >
> > Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
> > Especially not just to make ps_status work...
>
> Agreed.  If that is what is required, I think you can forget ps status
> on that platform.

Bruce,

    have  you  taken a look at my statistics collector stuff yet?
    The  view  pgstat_activity  shows  datid,  datname,  procpid,
    usesysid, usename and current_query per backend.

    The  code still needs some more work, but as it is it's ready
    to apply as soon as 7.1 is out the door. All that is  totally
    OS  independant,  restricts  the  display  of querystrings to
    postgres superusers and works remotely.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?
Next
From: "Ascent Avenues"
Date:
Subject: postgres