Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date
Msg-id 20010328.23541300@ler-freebie.iadfw.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
I tend to agree, but wanted someone else's opinion.

LER


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/28/01, 5:51:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote regarding Re:
[ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris :


> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms
> > including UnixWare.  The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to
> > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but
> > if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.

> Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
> Especially not just to make ps_status work...

>                       regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Next
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris