Re: Spinlocks on SGI's - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mathijs Brands
Subject Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
Date
Msg-id 20010327160249.E62357@ilse.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Spinlocks on SGI's  (bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri))
Responses Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:59:45AM -0500, Robert E. Bruccoleri allegedly wrote:
> I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> years ago (using the test_and_set library calls). It's been working
> for me ever since in a heavy multi-user environment. Please don't
> change it unless there's an overwhelming reason.
> 
> Also, the GNU compiler systems works poorly on SGI's. In this
> environment, you need to stick to the SGI provided compilers. Once you
> get used to them, they work fairly well.

The problem is that SGI wants a couple of hundred dollars for it :(

Regards,

Mathijs
-- 
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.                                                   Erik Naggum


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
Date:
Subject: Spinlocks on SGI's
Next
From: bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks on SGI's