> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > You probably want to define this in Makefile.hpux (compare to
> > Makefile.linux for example), unless you want to link *all* shared
> > libraries this way.
>
> Hm. I don't see a reason not to do all our shlibs that way;
> it seems to me that being able to break a shlib by means of
> an accidental conflict with one of its internal function names
> is a Bad Thing.
>
> But I suppose it's probably best to treat HPUX as much like the
> other platforms as possible. Will change, unless I can talk you
> into changing all the rest.
Peter made the same suggestion for me for BSDI, and it made sense once I
saw it. It put all the OS-specific stuff in separate files.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
