> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > >
> > > I don't think it's a good idea to fill bit 13 by force.
> > > There's only 1 bit unused. IMHO there must be a discussion
> > > about how to use the bit.
> >
> > I am not doing anything to 7.1, just 7.2. My patch is just an attempt
> > to make the source accurate.
>
> Hmm I've already been confused by your attempt.
> For example, oops where's the discussion about changing
> index tuple length limit ? etc ...
> And I understand now that the original question was thrown
> to Tom. I'll leave the choise to Tom.
The patch never intended to increase the index tuple length. It was
only to better document how IndexTupleData is used. Both Tom and I
agreed that the use of bits/contants/macros in itup.h was not idea, and
needed a little cleaning. That's all the patch does.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
