Re: WAL and commit_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date
Msg-id 200102172045.PAA02841@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Re: WAL and commit_delay  (ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers))
List pgsql-hackers
> Right now the WAL preallocation code (XLogFileInit) is not good enough
> because it does lseek to the 16MB position and then writes 1 byte there.
> On an implementation that supports holes in files (which is most Unixen)
> that doesn't cause physical allocation of the intervening space.  We'd
> have to actually write zeroes into all 16MB to ensure the space is
> allocated ... but that's just a couple more lines of code.

Are OS's smart enough to not allocate zero-written blocks?  Do we need
to write non-zeros?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance lossage in checkpoint dumping
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL and commit_delay