Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
Date
Msg-id 20010217154635M.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> "Schmidt, Peter" <peter.schmidt@prismedia.com> writes:
> > So, is it OK to use commit_delay=0?
>
> Certainly.  In fact, I think that's about to become the default ;-)

I agree with Tom. I did some benchmarking tests using pgbench for a
computer magazine in Japan. I got a almost equal or better result for
7.1 than 7.0.3 if commit_delay=0. See included png file.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance