Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Date
Msg-id 200101140308.WAA01140@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems  (Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
> Attached is a revised patch that removes the static SimpleDateFormat
> objects that Thomas pointed out might be a problem.

Thanks.  I will apply it as soon as I can.

> PS.  Is this the correct way to submit patches by sending to
> pgsql-patches?  It appeared from some of the comments on my last
> submission that there is some other approval/review process that I
> should go through first, but I don't see that documented anywhere, so if
> I am doing something wrong, please forgive me, and point me in the right
> direction.

No, Barry, you are doing great.  Seems we have an internal issue here
because I don't understand the java code, so I have trouble evaluating
it, and sometimes I am over-eager to get these jdbc fixes into the code.

Please, just keep doing what you are doing.  The JDBC driver needs all
the help it can get.

> PPS.  I have included and updated the comments from the original patch
> request to reflect the changes made in this revised patch.

Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Revised Patch for JDBC timestamp problems
Next
From: "Brett W. McCoy"
Date:
Subject: Question about EJB