Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
Date
Msg-id 200011280230.VAA01573@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Responses Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
List pgsql-hackers
> At 08:39 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> >> If it breaks anything in PostgreSQL I sure haven't seen any evidence -- the
> >> box this database is running on gets hit pretty hard and I haven't had a
> >> single ounce of trouble since I went to 7.0.X
> >
> >Larger block sizes mean larger blocks in the cache, therefore fewer
> >blocks per megabyte.  The more granular the cache, the better.
> 
> Well, true, but when you have 256 MB or a half-gig or more to devote to
> the cache, you get plenty of blocks, and in pre-PG 7.1 the 8KB limit is a
> pain for a lot of folks.

Agreed.  The other problem is that most people have 2-4MB of cache, so a
32k default would be too big for them.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main..