Current timestamp parsing is quite complex and buggy
in my opinion, i.e. '2000-09-22 13:21:39+02' works (inserted
with now() function) but inserting '2000-09-22 13:21:39.11+02'::timestamp
(important is '.11+02') does not work (as I know). The problem
exists because postgresql _does_not_ show timestamp in unambiguous way.
After applying attached patch, JDBC sets datestyle to SQL and
uses 'MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss.SS zzzz' format to parse a timestamp.
However the question remains. What should be fixed? JDBC or postgresql?
wrobell <wrobell@posexperts.com.pl>
