Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh
Date
Msg-id 200011161759.MAA18222@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
Responses Re: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> 
> > But we have very few Informix functions moving to PostgreSQL.
> 
> I do not understand this comment.
> What you imho forget here is that a definition for an interface will eventually be
> included in the SQL standard. 
> And it will be what Oracle or DB/2 (maybe even Informix) does.

OK, lets call the old style "stdC" and the new one "C".


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language nam esh
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)