Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh
Date
Msg-id 200011160442.XAA24753@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
> To answer another misconception that I saw in this thread:
> 
> : The old language names "internal" and "C" will continue to refer to
> : functions with the old calling convention.  We should deprecate
> : old-style functions because of their portability problems, but the
> : support for them will only be one small function handler routine,
> : so we can leave them in place for as long as necessary.

My question is can we drop newC and use just plain C in 7.2 or 7.3?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: int4 or int32
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SearchSysCacheTuple(Copy)