Re: how good is PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim Mercer
Subject Re: how good is PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20001031200859.C25794@reptiles.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: how good is PostgreSQL  (Gunnar R|nning <gunnar@candleweb.no>)
Responses Re: how good is PostgreSQL  (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>)
List pgsql-general
i have a client which merged two companies, one running perl the other running
java.

what to do?

i convinced them to port both the perl and java code to INTERCAL, and run
the whole system on an array of C-64's.

works better than either of the perl or java stuff.

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 01:58:55AM +0100, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> "Steve Wolfe" <steve@iboats.com> writes:
> >   One of our competitors spent a very, very large deal of money on high-end
> > Sun equipment, so that they could write their CGI stuff in Java servlets.
> > It still ran slow.  We run Perl on machines that pale compared to theirs,
> > and get far better performance. : )
>
> You can always do it slow if you don't design properly. A former customer
> saved a lot hardware and maintenance cost by migrating from a perl based
> publishing system to a Java based one. Less hardware, better performance and
> more functionality. ;-) The old perl system had been developed and maintained
> over a 4 year period - the initial development of the new Java based system
> took about 9 months.

--
[ Jim Mercer                 jim@reptiles.org              +1 416 410-5633 ]
[          Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood          ]
[  Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code.  ]

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gunnar R|nning
Date:
Subject: Re: how good is PostgreSQL
Next
From: Alex Pilosov
Date:
Subject: Re: how good is PostgreSQL