> > > I doubt everyone would like trading query speed for insert/update
> > > speed plus index size
> >
> > If he is scanning through the entire index, he could do a sequential
> > scan of the table, grab all the tid transaction status values, and use
> > those when viewing the index. No need to store/update the transaction
> > status in the index that way.
>
> Huh ? How ? It is how you do it now. Do you expect
> load several milion transaction statuses into memory,
> then scan index and lookup these values ?
> Missed I something ?
> devik
>
>
Not sure. I figured they were pretty small values.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
