Was this addressed?
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I assume this breakage is from the recent RELKIND_VIEW change;
> >> probably psql didn't get updated to know about the new relkind.
>
> > Probably psql uses pg_views though I don't remember correctly.
> > It seemd that pg_views(initdb) should be changed first.
>
> No, pg_views still works --- although it could be made far more
> efficient (don't need the WHERE EXISTS(...) test anymore, just look
> at relkind). So I don't think that explains why psql is misbehaving.
>
> You are right that we ought to change the definition of pg_views,
> anyway.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
