> Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes:
> > On a somewhat related note, what about the NO_SECURITY defines
> > strewn throughout the backend? Does anyone run the server with
> > NO_SECURITY defined? And if so, what benefit is that over just
> > running with everything owned by the same user?
>
> I suppose the idea was to avoid expending *any* cycles on security
> checks if you didn't need them in your particular situation. But
> offhand I've never heard of anyone actually using the feature. I'm
> dubious whether the amount of time saved would be worth the trouble.
NO_SECURITY define removed.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
