Re: Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h
Date
Msg-id 20001010154715.A620@feivel.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:37:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > But perhaps it is ecpg's fault for including "elog.h".
> > IMHO these defines should never leave the database kernel.
> ... 
> Yes, leaking into user programs is a bad practice.  Is there a
> solution/patch for that?

Hmm, I haven't check carefully, but I don't think ecpg include elog.h
directly. Maybe I just picked the wrong file to include.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS broken?
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Announcing PgSQL - a Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to PostgreSQL