Re: Problem Building Cygwin PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Jason Tishler
Subject Re: Problem Building Cygwin PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20000922155051.A2515@DP
Whole thread Raw
In response to Problem Building Cygwin PostgreSQL  (Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Problem Building Cygwin PostgreSQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-ports
Earnie,

On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:01:25AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Hmm...  This appears that it would potentially cause a memory leak.  What
> happens if instead of this patch you initialize the pointer to NULL?

I guess that I should have giving more context:

    void
    usage(void)
    {
        ...
        user = getenv("USER");
        if (!user)
        {
    #ifndef WIN32
            pw = getpwuid(geteuid());
            if (pw)
                user = pw->pw_name;
            ...
    #else
            user = "?";
    #endif
        }
        ...
    #if !defined(WIN32) && !defined(__CYGWIN__)
        if (pw)
            free(pw);
    #endif
    }

The relevant Cygwin source (i.e., src/winsup/cygwin/passwd.cc) and the
getpwuid() man page (from Solaris):

    The  functions  getpwnam(),  getpwuid(),   getpwent(),   and
    fgetpwent() use *static* storage that is re-used in each call,
    making these routines unsafe for use in multithreaded appli-
    cations.

seemed to indicate that free-ing the return value from getpwuid() was a
bad idea.  Can someone confirm or refute this supposition?

Thanks,
Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corporation         Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:   http://www.dothill.com

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem Building Cygwin PostgreSQL
Next
From: Pete Forman
Date:
Subject: Re: NT FAQ needs updating