Re: 7.0.2 and 6.5.3 performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: 7.0.2 and 6.5.3 performance
Date
Msg-id 20000916224534.A31390@rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.0.2 and 6.5.3 performance  (lec <englim@pc.jaring.my>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 12:42:30PM +0800, lec wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Um, have you vacuum analyzed the tables involved?
>
> The tables were vacuumed before explain.
>

Just to clairify: 'VACUUM'ed, or 'VACUUM ANALYZE'd? There's a
difference. A plain vacuum just reclaims space, the ANALYZE keyword is
needed to update the stats.


--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Horst Herb"
Date:
Subject: inheritance problem
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: LOCK TABLE question