Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST]
Date
Msg-id 20000708230923O.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST]  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > But how do you know if that file still belongs to an active postmaster? 
> > > What if it exited before removing the file.  Seems we would have to
> > > write the PID into the file, and do a kill() to see if it is running.
> 
> I believe we already do this (SetPidFile() in
> utils/init/miscinit.c). Isn't it sufficient (1) to prevent starting a
> new postmaster on the same data dir and (2) to unlink the accidently
> left socket file?

I noticed what I was missing after sending the mail. Sorry for the
confusion. Seems the idea trying to connect a postmaster looks good.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: fcntl(SETLK) [was Re: 2nd update on TOAST]
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: crypt and MD5 - still not wanted