Re: Is this still true? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Is this still true?
Date
Msg-id 200006240248.WAA27202@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this still true?  (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>)
List pgsql-general
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.23  Is this a leftover
> > > from previous versions of postgres or is this still true for 7.0?
> > >
> >
> > Still true in 7.0.
>
> Gee. Shouldn't 4.24 use the advice above in 4.23?
>
> I.E., shouldn't it read:
>
> SELECT tab1.col1, tab2.col2
> FROM tab1, tab2
> WHERE tab1.col1 = tab2.col1
> UNION ALL
> SELECT tab1.col1, NULL
> FROM tab1
> WHERE tab1.col1 NOT EXISTS
>  (SELECT tab2.col1 FROM tab2 WHERE tab1.col1 = tab2.col1)
> ORDER BY tab1.col1

Yes, but it seems too confusing to mix them.  We really need both those
features added to PostgreSQL.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: Is this still true?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: boolean isn't boolean?