Re: followup to SELECT/INSERT problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim Mercer
Subject Re: followup to SELECT/INSERT problem
Date
Msg-id 20000623135415.J24735@reptiles.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: followup to SELECT/INSERT problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 12:00:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> writes:
> > it appears that each call to UPDATE seems to be taking a long, long time to
> > complete.
>
> Poor choice of plan, maybe?  What does EXPLAIN say about how a typical
> example of the UPDATE will be executed?

silly me, i should have know to do more investigation before going to the list.

as it turns out, the index on the key was not being used.

a "vacuum verbose analyze" caused things to run much, much faster.
(hence the UPDATE ... WHERE key = ... was taking extra long)

--
[ Jim Mercer                 jim@reptiles.org              +1 416 410-5633 ]
[          Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood          ]
[  Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code.  ]

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vassili A Akimov
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to improve performance
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to improve performance