Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Robinson
Subject Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 200006150452.MAA04005@netrinsics.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>The issue is that some people felt we shouldn't be performing such
>checks, and some did.

Well, more precisely, the issue was stalemated at "one person felt we 
should perform such checks" and "one person (who, incidentally, wrote the
code) felt we shouldn't".

Obviously, as it stands, the issue is going nowhere.

I was just hoping to encourage more people to examine the problem, so that
we might get a consensus one way or the other.
-Michael Robinson



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items