This fix will appear in 7.01, and is in tonight's snapshot. Please let
us know if that does not fix it.
> I think I've found a bug in how the jdbc driver (JDBC2) numbers the rows
> in a result set. According to Sun's documentation for the ResultSet
> interface, the rows in a result set should be numbered starting with
> 1. However, the ResultSet.java's first() routine set's current_row to
> 0. The odd thing is that beforeFirst() also sets current_row to 0, it
> just does not load this_row. The bug manifests itself as such:
>
> given ResultSet rs containing two rows:
>
> rs.last();
> System.out.println("Last id is: "+rs.getRow());
> rs.first();
> System.out.println("First id is: "+rs.getRow());
>
> produces the output:
>
> Last id is: 1
> First id is: 0
>
> I think the easiest fix would be to change getRow() so that it returns
> current_row+1, and change beforeFirst so that it sets current_row to
> -1. I'm not sure what other changes need to be made, but since the JDBC
> driver does not allow one to refer directly to row numbers, I can't think
> of any other changes offhand.
>
> Or am I all wet and this is not a bug? Please respond to me directly, as
> I'm not a member of this list.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
