Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Olivier Galibert
Subject Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Date
Msg-id 20000410142239.A1682@nemesis.ncsl.nist.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:45:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Offhand, if you do not put -I into your compile switches, I'd be
> somewhat surprised that either way would work for you.  Certainly
> hardcoding a full path into application source code is a completely
> unportable way to do things...

Not when it's autoconf that does the hardcoding :-)

With the number of external librairies we use, the amount of -I was
becoming a bit too high for our tastes...

  OG.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Didier Verna
Date:
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3