Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yury Zhuravlev
Subject Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Date
Msg-id 1fbd333a-6072-4d79-8608-62e228472cfa@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:
> Did you read what I wrote?
Read.

>That's not correct for char booleans, because the can have different bits set.
Current code support this behavior. But to shoot his leg becomes easier.
!= 0 much better of course.

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support