Hello, Tom,
On 08.07.2023 18:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> What we ought to be doing is resetting these two flags
> after the disable_all_timeouts call.
Oops, I missed that.
> Having done that, it wouldn't really be necessary to mark these
> as volatile. I kept that marking anyway for consistency with
> send_ready_for_query, but perhaps we shouldn't?
I don't know. Maybe marking them volatile is more future proof. Not sure.
>> I also moved firstchar's declaration inside the loop where it's used, to
>> make it clear that this variable needn't be volatile and is not
>> preserved after longjmp().
>
> Good idea, but then why not the same for input_message? It's fully
> reinitialized each time through the loop, too.
Yeah, that's better.
> In short, something like the attached, except I'm not totally sold
> on changing the volatility of the timeout flags.
Looks good to me.
Thank you.
--
Sergey Shinderuk https://postgrespro.com/
